Connectivity

Friday, October 27, 2006

Distracted by Maps....

If anyone is wondering where I am, I have been writing on the blog Reading The Maps. Which has meant I have been neglecting my on blog alittle. In the meantime check out Reading the Maps and my comments there.

I am hoping that my fellow contributor Sunflower will write something in the not too distant future, once here exams are over....

P.S. This painting, 'Diva', was done by the artist Werner Berges in 1995. In 1992 I spent many days at his family home in Schallstadt, near Freiburg (Germany) , while on student exchange there. His daughter did an exchange to New Zealand with one of my best friends. I have many fond memories of my time there, staying at the Berges' home (an old farm house and artist haven) - their house was always open to everyone and welcoming.

'Born in Cloppenburg in 1941, the artist Werner Berges was among those who first practised and established Pop Art in Germany. He is one of the most renowned German pop artists and is included in numerous public and private collections worldwide.Glowing primary colours, clearly defined contours, the application of halftone dots and grid-lines, which playfully lend the paintings an air of the mechanically reproduced, are all typical of his works. Berges’ works are continually concerned with images of women culled from the world of advertising, which attain a new meaning and status through his artistic handling.Women are his subjects – dazzling models and stars from the worlds of advertising and fashion photography. Erotically posed bodies, seductive looks and radiant faces are rendered in rich colours, halftone dots, grid lines and collage.' (from wernerberges.com)

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Video shows apparent shooting on Tibetans by China
Reuters
Monday, October 16, 2006; 3:22 AM

BEIJING (Reuters) - Video footage shot by a Romanian television station appears to show Chinese soldiers firing at a group of Tibetans as they attempt to cross a mountain pass into Nepal, days after China defended the soldiers' action.
The video, taken by Romania's Pro TV, shows a line of people trekking through the snow when sounds of gunfire are heard and one of the figures crumples to the ground. The footage is shot from too far away to make out identities, but a voice can be heard saying in English, "They are shooting them like dogs."


A group of climbers from Britain and Australia told Reuters last week that on September 30 they watched Chinese border guards take aim at a group of 20 to 30 people as they prepared to cross from Chinese territory into Nepal.

Tibet has been ruled by China since Communist troops invaded in 1950, and the government deals harshly with Tibetans who press for greater political and religious freedoms.
Hundreds of people cross the Himalayas to Nepal every year, most of them en route to the Indian hill station of Dharamsala, the home of their spiritual leader the Dalai Lama and Tibet's government-in-exile.

China's state media has confirmed that troops fired on about 70 people near the frontier with Nepal and that one of them died. But it defended the shooting, saying the group was trying to cross the border illegally and attacked the soldiers when they tried to persuade the group to return home.

The video shows no such confrontation, and the London-based International Campaign for Tibet, which said a Tibetan nun was killed in the incident, rejected China's defense.
"It is deplorable that the People's Armed Police act as if shooting Tibetans crossing into Nepal is a legitimate expression of their authority," Mary Beth Markey, the group's executive director, said in a statement.

In another sign of unrest in the isolated region, a group of Tibetans forced the delay of a Canadian mining company's operations, angered over test-drilling. Vancouver-based Continental Minerals Corp. said it was drilling near a village about 3 km (2 miles) from the main area of operations for its Xietongmen copper-gold project, near the Tibet city of Shigatse, on June 19 when residents raised concerns.

But it denied reports from a Tibet independence group that a serious confrontation occurred.
"We delayed work in this particular area until the concerns had been addressed to the satisfaction of all the local community and then the activities resumed," Shari Gardiner, a spokeswoman for Continental, wrote in an e-mail response to Reuters.
"Work in our main area of operations continued as normal throughout this period," she said. "At no time did the villagers ask us to leave Tibet."

Continental, wholly owned by private miner Hunter Dickinson Inc., holds its interests in the Xietongmen site through a local company, Tibet Tian Yuan Minerals Exploration Ltd. The exploration license for the site, also known as Shethongmon, was issued by China's Ministry of Land and Resources.

Students for a Free Tibet called on the company to withdraw from the region.
"This incident again demonstrates that Canadian and other mining firms have no business in Tibet until the Tibetan people are in a position to decide the use of their own natural resources," the group's executive director, Lhadon Tethong, said in a statement.
© 2006 Reuters










Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Let me denounce genocide from the dock

Suddenly, those Armenian mass graves opened up before my own eyes

By Robert Fisk10/14/06 "The Independent"

This has been a bad week for Holocaust deniers. I'm talking about those who wilfully lie about the 1915 genocide of 1.5 million Armenian Christians by the Ottoman Turks. On Thursday, France's lower house of parliament approved a Bill making it a crime to deny that Armenians suffered genocide. And, within an hour, Turkey's most celebrated writer, Orhan Pamuk - only recently cleared by a Turkish court for insulting "Turkishness" (sic) by telling a Swiss newspaper that nobody in Turkey dared mention the Armenian massacres - won the Nobel Prize for Literature. In the mass graves below the deserts of Syria and beneath the soil of southern Turkey, a few souls may have been comforted.

While Turkey continues to blather on about its innocence - the systematic killing of hundreds of thousands of male Armenians and of their gang-raped women is supposed to be the sad result of "civil war" - Armenian historians such as Vahakn Dadrian continue to unearth new evidence of the premeditated Holocaust (and, yes, it will deserve its capital H since it was the direct precursor of the Jewish Holocaust, some of whose Nazi architects were in Turkey in 1915) with all the energy of a gravedigger.

Armenian victims were killed with daggers, swords, hammers and axes to save ammunition. Massive drowning operations were carried out in the Black Sea and the Euphrates rivers - mostly of women and children, so many that the Euphrates became clogged with corpses and changed its course for up to half a mile. But Dadrian, who speaks and reads Turkish fluently, has now discovered that tens of thousands of Armenians were also burned alive in haylofts.

He has produced an affidavit to the Turkish court martial that briefly pursued the Turkish mass murderers after the First World War, a document written by General Mehmet Vehip Pasha, commander of the Turkish Third Army. He testified that, when he visited the Armenian village of Chourig (it means "little water" in Armenian), he found all the houses packed with burned human skeletons, so tightly packed that all were standing upright. "In all the history of Islam," General Vehip wrote, "it is not possible to find any parallel to such savagery."

The Armenian Holocaust, now so "unmentionable" in Turkey, was no secret to the country's population in 1918. Millions of Muslim Turks had witnessed the mass deportation of Armenians three years earlier - a few, with infinite courage, protected Armenian neighbours and friends at the risk of the lives of their own Muslim families - and, on 19 October 1918, Ahmed Riza, the elected president of the Turkish senate and a former supporter of the Young Turk leaders who committed the genocide, stated in his inaugural speech: "Let's face it, we Turks savagely (vahshiane in Turkish) killed off the Armenians."

Dadrian has detailed how two parallel sets of orders were issued, Nazi-style, by Turkish interior minister Talat Pasha. One set solicitously ordered the provision of bread, olives and protection for Armenian deportees but a parallel set instructed Turkish officials to "proceed with your mission" as soon as the deportee convoys were far enough away from population centres for there to be few witnesses to murder. As Turkish senator Reshid Akif Pasha testified on 19 November 1918: "The 'mission' in the circular was: to attack the convoys and massacre the population... I am ashamed as a Muslim, I am ashamed as an Ottoman statesman. What a stain on the reputation of the Ottoman Empire, these criminal people..."

How extraordinary that Turkish dignitaries could speak such truths in 1918, could fully admit in their own parliament to the genocide of the Armenians and could read editorials in Turkish newspapers of the great crimes committed against this Christian people. Yet how much more extraordinary that their successors today maintain that all of this is a myth, that anyone who says in present-day Istanbul what the men of 1918 admitted can find themselves facing prosecution under the notorious Law 301 for "defaming" Turkey.

I'm not sure that Holocaust deniers - of the anti-Armenian or anti-Semitic variety - should be taken to court for their rantings. David Irving is a particularly unpleasant "martyr" for freedom of speech and I am not at all certain that Bernard Lewis's one-franc fine by a French court for denying the Armenian genocide in a November 1993 Le Monde article did anything more than give publicity to an elderly historian whose work deteriorates with the years.

But it's gratifying to find French President Jacques Chirac and his interior minister Nicolas Sarkozy have both announced that Turkey will have to recognise the Armenian death as genocide before it is allowed to join the European Union. True, France has a powerful half-million-strong Armenian community.

But, typically, no such courage has been demonstrated by Lord Blair of Kut al-Amara, nor by the EU itself, which gutlessly and childishly commented that the new French Bill, if passed by the senate in Paris, will "prohibit dialogue" which is necessary for reconciliation between Turkey and modern-day Armenia. What is the subtext of this, I wonder. No more talk of the Jewish Holocaust lest we hinder "reconciliation" between Germany and the Jews of Europe?

But, suddenly, last week, those Armenian mass graves opened up before my own eyes. Next month, my Turkish publishers are producing my book, The Great War for Civilisation, in the Turkish language, complete with its long chapter on the Armenian genocide entitled "The First Holocaust". On Thursday, I received a fax from Agora Books in Istanbul. Their lawyers, it said, believed it "very likely that they will be sued under Law 301" - which forbids the defaming of Turkey and which right-wing lawyers tried to use against Pamuk - but that, as a foreigner, I would be "out of reach". However, if I wished, I could apply to the court to be included in any Turkish trial.

Personally, I doubt if the Holocaust deniers of Turkey will dare to touch us. But, if they try, it will be an honour to stand in the dock with my Turkish publishers, to denounce a genocide which even Mustafa Kamel Ataturk, founder of the modern Turkish state, condemned.

Sunday, October 15, 2006

Tibetans Shot By Chinese Soldiers

Thursday, October 12, 2006

Tibet Killings

I have just read about recent Chinese atrocities towards Tibetans. The story brought home to me again what a dire situation Tibetans face daily. It has been confirmed that on 30 September 2006 Chinese forces fired on innocent Tibetan refugees (mostly children) on the Nangpa La mountain pass. At least two children were killed and others shot. Chinese officials are reportedly trying to track down and silence Western climbers and Sherpas who witnessed the killings.

Leonard Doyle, Foreign Editor for The Independent, wrote today, …'fears grow for the safety of a group of Tibetan children, aged between six and 10, who were marched away after at least two refugees including a nun, were shot dead. The children were being sent by their parents into exile in Nepal to be educated as part of a group of about 70 refugees crossing the Nangpa Pass. Secretive crossings are usually made at night or in winter. But this time - probably because of the children in their group - the Tibetans crossed in the morning. They were travelling lightly, clad in jackets and boots without any mountaineering equipment, when they were attacked. The nun who was killed, Kelsang Namtso, 17, was leading the children. A 13-year-old boy was also gunned down during 15 minutes of shooting witnessed by Western climbers, including two British policemen, 1,000 yards away at Cho Oyu camp.

Later three Chinese soldiers marched the children through the camp - some 12 miles west of Mount Everest - as climbers and Sherpas looked on. None of the Westerners tried to help the Tibetans. Fears for the safety of Western climbers still in Tibet and worries that China will clamp down on profitable climbing operations - it costs up to £30,000 for an attempt on Everest - have meant that news of the incident has been slow to emerge.

An American climber, who asked not to be identified, told of his revulsion at the failure of other climbers to speak out. "Did it make anyone turn away and go home? Not one," he said. "People are climbing right in front of you to escape persecution while you are trying to climb a mountain. It's insane."’ You can read the rest of the article on the Independent website.

Witnesses say that soldiers fired on the refugees for 15 minutes. It is being reported that up to seven people were shot dead. A Tibetan monk that managed to escape said that the western mountaineers took pictures. The world should see those images – let’s hope that they are not too afraid to make them public. It’s time that China was made accountable for the human rights violations that continue in Tibet.

BACKGROUND (taken from freetibet.org)
Approximately 2,500 Tibetans annually flee over the Himalayas into exile, escaping the brutality of China's occupation. It is difficult to know how many are caught or shot by the Chinese border authorities. Previous similar allegations have remained uninvestigated. MountEverest.net, a climbers' website, was the first to report of the killing and quoted a "trusted source" (a western mountaineer who was climbing at the time) as reporting that he witnessed the Chinese Army shoot at a line of Tibetan refugees as they made their way to the Nangpa La Pass at the border with Nepal. The shooting by the Chinese border guards is in violation of the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials (1990), which requires that "Law enforcement officials shall not use firearms against persons except in self-defence or defence of others against the imminent threat of death or serious injury, to prevent the perpetration of a particularly serious crime involving grave threat to life, to arrest a person presenting such a danger and resisting their authority, or to prevent his or her escape, and only when less extreme means are insufficient to achieve these objectives. In any event, intentional lethal use of firearms may only be made when strictly unavoidable in order to protect life." (Principle 9).

Below are links to blogs and further news on this story:
Links
The Independent - China tries to gag climbers who saw Tibet killings
Students for a free tibet blog
http://www.freetibet.org/campaigns/uc061006.html
Reuters - Climbers watched as Chinese guards shot Tibetans
Times UK Online - Mountaineers see nun shot dead near Everest camp
Daily India - Nun was shot dead near Everest camp
International Herald Tribune - Report: China holding Tibetan Children after refugee shooting http://www.savetibet.org/campaigns/refugees/index.php
Free Tibet Blog

Monday, October 09, 2006

Maps at the blog Reading the Maps has been writing about his 'journey" with the Dalai Lama', but his understanding of Buddhist philosophy and teaching is limited to twenty pages of one book. My own understanding of Buddhism isn’t extensive either, but I have written about my experience of living and travelling in the Buddhist regions of Northern India in 1995 on Map's blog. You can read my piece there....




Undergound Press/Counterculture/Feminism

I read this article about one woman's views on the birth of the counterculture - you might find it interesting and relevant in this age of blogging.

It was the decade of love and peace. But without its irreverent free press, the Sixties would never have changed the world. Rosie Boycott takes a trip back to the birth of the counterculture
Power to the People
Sunday October 8, 2006The Observer

I turned 17 in the summer of 1967. That summer I smoked my first joint at a Rolling Stones Concert in Hyde Park and walked barefooted through the hot streets of west London, wearing floral bell-bottomed trousers and a coat I'd made out of a silk tablecloth that had belonged to my grandmother, which had long tassels and small daisies embroidered in purple thread.

I was still officially living at home with my parents in the heart of the Shropshire countryside and one sweltering August afternoon I had to meet my mother, who'd come to town for the day, to join her on the train journey home. I hadn't slept for what seemed like days, I'd been up at the Round House listening to Jefferson Airplane and the Crazy World of Arthur Brown. I'd been smoking a lot of dope and I'd gone home with the manager, who wore a beautiful blue velvet jacket and drove a matching coloured Saab. I'd been meeting up with some Peruvian radicals in the Troubadour Cafe to help plan a Vietnam march. To my mind, there was no contradiction between the two worlds. My head was full of thoughts of drugs, revolution, the words of Che Guevara and the psychedelic visions of Aldous Huxley.

And my mother went ballistic about my feet.

Standing in Paddington station, the commuter traffic streaming past us - anxious then as now to catch the train to take them home to their suburban life (then my idea of hell) - my mother ranted and raved about the disgrace of walking through London with dirty feet. I remember looking at her, not upset, not angry, just full of sympathy that she didn't get it.

It was a whole new world, as I saw it, freed from bourgeois shackles. The aim of the counterculture was to shake up the existing situation, to change the world of the pinched grey people who lived grey lives in grey bedrooms. We wanted to elevate non-material values through the global power of rock'n'roll, and we believed we could do this through drugs, music, having fun, hanging out. Rules were simple: there were good guys and bad guys, the narcotics police were bad, governments were bad, war was bad, the mainstream media was bad. Under the powerful vibes of the good people all these would somehow fade away.

It was extraordinary arrogance, but we thought that we would be responsible for a moral advance that would match the technological advances of the previous hundred years. And I was having fun, more fun than I could remember, and I couldn't see why it wouldn't last for ever, and I couldn't see why it couldn't be communicated and shared by everyone, including, in that instance, my mother, fretting on the station concourse in a neat blue suit, white blouse and high heels. She may even have been wearing a hat.

My first job was on an underground newspaper called Frendz. We operated from a chaotic office which spanned two floors of a run-down terrace at the top of the Portobello Road. Out on the street, jokers and pranksters with beads, bells and mantras riffled through tatty bargains and baubles on the street stalls. We never had any money and as one holding company went broke, we'd create another, changing the magazine from Friends to Frendz to keep within the law.

Donations came in the strangest shapes: one day a woman arrived with a dirty white handbag stuffed with five pound notes which she proceeded to throw around the office like Kleenex. She needed somewhere to stay and installed her own set of old rusty bed springs under a window, where she lay, naked and exposed, while the office bustled by around her. The contents of her bag paid the print bills, but how we all actually survived is a mystery I cannot fathom to this day. We lived well, but my pay fluctuated between £5 and £10 a week.

We had a naive belief in our right to do things and to do things big. Earlier in the decade, because Allen Ginsberg happened to be in town, it was decided to rent not just a small local community centre but the Albert Hall to stage a poetry reading, The time from idea to event was a mere 10 days. RD Laing, the counterculture hero, brought all the schizophrenic patients from his clinic along to the gig in the belief that poetry might inspire them. At the launch of IT magazine, Britain's first underground newspaper, Paul McCartney came dressed as an Arab. The party was held in the Round House and someone had made a giant jelly using a bathtub as a mould. Pink Floyd's van ran into it before the party even began, leaving sticky liquid oozing across the floor.

We published the magazine every fortnight, pulling together a disorganised collection of stories, reports, jokes and cartoons. Why was the Reading Festival such a disaster (The police? The site? The rain? The faulty PA system?) What was the current world price of dope? And where could you find the best stuff? Where were the latest Vietnam protests taking place? What on earth were auras? Frendz had been started by my then boyfriend, the lexicographer Jonathon Green, and a South African called Alan Marcuson. The original designer was Barney Bubbles, who had been to San Francisco and met the Grateful Dead, which gave him instant street cred. Barney would disappear every week or so, rucksack on his back, and vanish into the countryside, where he'd drop an enormous amount of acid.

People would appear and disappear. Stanislav Demidjuk, a vision in brown leather, a silver belt and an Australian accent, showed up one day and persuaded Alan and Jonathon that blowing up the Paddington Green Police Station was necessary for the Revolution. They all climbed into a cab to carry out the task, but en route Stan stopped off to visit Richard Branson, with whom he'd fallen out over the political direction of Student Magazine (Branson's first business venture). A fight ensued and the mission was abandoned.

I couldn't type so I was given an editorial job. I wrote short pieces, helped lay out pages and one day, six weeks into the job, I was handed a tape recorder and told to get along to the Apple offices in Savile Row to interview John and Yoko. Yoko's book Grapefruit had been disastrously reviewed and England's most famous couple needed soothing words from the underground press. Yoko talked non-stop, small and fierce under her wild black hair, while I worried that the tape recorder wouldn't work. I wanted to talk to John about the Sergeant Pepper album: there was a hippy belief that if you read the album cover upside down, you could discover the secret phone number of the Beatles. By chance, the numbers actually led callers to the Guardian's night newsdesk, which took calls from around the world asking how John and Paul were doing. Had this been part of the plan, I wondered. When I finally managed to break through Yoko's monologue, John looked at me over his famous wire-rimmed spectacles and mumbled, 'Yeah, cool, man, really cool.'

By the time I arrived at Frendz in 1970 the glory days were almost over. In the middle of the Sixties the various factions - spiritual, political, psychedelic and radical - had managed to combine their differences, united in a belief that change, any change, was better than the status quo. By the end of the decade the more radical camps were in ascendance, the hippies with their love and peace life style consigned to a back water. Laid back, in the end, had meant losing out, and the hippy philosophy, which eschewed commercialism, paved the way for the culture's own demise.

When the establishment saw the commercial potential in health food, country-style furniture and kaftans, and produced Laura Ashley and Terence Conran, the hippies thought it was a good joke. Especially laughable was the news that cigarette companies had taken out patents on the brands of dope they intended to sell when marijuana was legalised. In the Frendz office we were visited increasingly by people with political axes to grind: IRA activists, the Black Panthers, the black radical Hakim Jamal, author of From the Dead Level (he was later shot in a gangland killing in Boston). In the winter of 1970 a group of women came who proposed that Frendz should publish a women's issue.

Over that autumn, Angie Weir and Hilary Creek were in and out of the office. For me, it was a revelation. The counterculture had championed change of every kind, but the role of women hadn't changed. Women still made the tea and did the typing: only now they were also expected to have sex with anyone who wanted it: to refuse was uncool and, God forbid, acting like a straight. Richard Neville, the editor of Oz, was quoted as saying, 'You can fuck any time, but ask a girl to make Ovaltine?'

Once the issue had gone to the press, Angie and Hilary disappeared. I saw them next in the Old Bailey where they were facing charges related to the Angry Brigade bombings. Biba had been blown up while the Frendz women's issue was going to press. They called me as a witness, but since I kept no diary and thus couldn't recall the dates accurately enough to provide an alibi, I wasn't much use and they were sent down for eight years.

The women's issue changed my life. Even though in 1969 the International Times, Britain's oldest underground paper, was condemning Miss World, the counterculture remained as male-dominated as the rest of British society. Mecca and Miss World were neat symbols of big business, capitalism and plastic living. The editors could sigh complacently because they weren't asking their girlfriends to parade around in swimsuits - but they weren't encouraging them to become reporters either. By 1970 feminism was becoming fashionable, but in Richard Neville's book, Playpower, the closest the index came to mentioning the women's movement was the 'Female Fuckability Test.' With Marsha Rowe, an Australian working on Oz magazine, I organised a series of meetings for women who worked in the underground press. A calm start soon gave way to animated disclosures about abortions, orgasms and humiliations at work. By the end of the third meeting we'd decided to start a magazine.

Spare Rib was launched in the summer of 1972. I was 21 and Marsha was 28. We had £3,000 in the bank and some old furniture we'd acquired from the offices of INK, a weekly paper that promised to bring a political edge to the counterculture, but collapsed into bankruptcy in under six months. No one thought we had a chance, but the time was right, the cash somehow kept appearing, and Spare Rib went on to publish for the next 20 years, helping to shape and define the feminist debate that has so changed British culture.

Would it have happened without the underground press? Probably, but not so soon and not on so few resources. The culture may have been flaky, but it allowed us to believe that anything was possible. The arrogance that helped bring about the counterculture's demise gave us an extraordinary sense of confidence. Looking back, it is hard to believe that at 21, I thought I had the right to publish a magazine which challenged the very heart of Western social structures. We used to call the established media the straight press and, much to our delight, they took us seriously. Feminism became the first cause which genuinely crossed the divide as it established itself in Britain.

Today, the original feminist beliefs of sisterhood, tolerance and a better world for both the sexes are all but forgotten, except on the net, where blogs unite women living in societies where they have no rights. Our Sixties equivalent of the 'straight press' is now known as 'dead-tree media'. The counterculture in the Sixties came about in response to a need and it is clearly still here today.
· 200 Trips From The Counterculture, by Jean-Francois Bizot, is published by Thames & Hudson at £19.95

Thursday, October 05, 2006

An Empowering Education

I have just posted a slightly different version of the piece below on the blog Reading the Maps if you want to read it there.

Maia at Capitalism Bad; Tree Pretty has been writing about alternatives in education. It got me thinking about my childhood and education. I spent all of my school life attending an alternative school – one that could be classed as following a holistic curriculum.

'Education should be understood as the art of cultivating the moral, emotional, physical, psychological and spiritual dimensions of the developing child. A holistic way of thinking seeks to encompass and integrate multiple layers of meaning and experience rather than defining human possibilities narrowly. Every child is more than a future employee; every person's intelligence and abilities are far more complex than his or her scores on standardized tests. Holistic education aims to call forth from people an intrinsic reverence for life and a passionate love of learning. This is done, not through an academic "curriculum" that condenses the world into instructional packages, but through direct engagement with the environment. Holistic education nurtures a sense of wonder'. http://www.infed.org/biblio/holisticeducation.htm

The aim of my school was to produce well-rounded individuals. Education needs to empower students now. The Education and teachers hopefully develop in the children such power of thought, such depth of feeling, such strength of will that they would emerge from their school years as full members of the Human Community, able to meet and transform the world. As in any organisation the school had its good and bad points but overall I feel extremely happy to have attended the school. I had many rich experiences throughout my school days. One of the strengths of the education was that it built up my self-confidence and ability to think laterally. A great tool for life - any gaps in knowledge could be filled in later, as I had the nous to go out and ask questions, research and discover things for myself. One of the wonderful aspects of my education was the school was like a community. Some of my closest friends now are people I went to school with from kindergarten. The school was co-educational and we were not streamed and so went through the school with the same group of students.

I remember my education as being very full and experiential - we would study topics in depth for a couple of hours a day for 3-4 weeks, e.g. Indian Mythology. We would learn about it using all types of learning e.g. Visual, Kinesthetic, Auditory, and Oral. For example, while studying Indian Mythology we heard stories, learnt music, poetry, cooked Indian food and learnt traditional dancing, learnt some of the language and put on a play as well – so it was an exceedingly full learning experience. This type of learning went all the way through the school from primary to secondary school. Subjects covered in the curriculum ranged from the Philosophy, Norse Mythology, Greek Mythology, History of Architecture, 20th Century History, Physics etc… These ‘Main Lessons’ ran alongside regular classes in English, PE, Maths etc… I remember we went on interesting school camps. As 12 year olds studying Geology we went on a camp to Waitomo and went caving.

The school day, the week and the year had a strong rhythm to it and gave us the sense of stability and connectedness to the world around us. We acknowledged the rhythm of the year by celebrating the change of seasons. For example, in autumn we would dress up in autumnal colours, have a harvest table of food we would give to charity, sing songs and eat a meal together (which we cooked). For winter we made a bonfire, made lanterns and went for a lantern walk at night and sang winter songs – very magical! The early years were full of art, drama, music, stories – the education really encourages the Child’s imagination. The way of teaching and learning engaged the children, acknowledging their world and the culture of childhood.

Tuesday, October 03, 2006

Vegetarian Film Fest October 8th to celebrate World Vegetarian Day

I find it a bit strange that there is to be a vegetarian film festival October 8 but it's a great chance to view the documentary feature film by Franny Armstrong, McLibel (see review below).

McLibel (U.K., 2005)
The postman and the gardener who took on McDonalds and won.'McLibel' is the story of two ordinary people who humiliated McDonald's in the biggest corporate PR disaster in history.McDonald's loved using the UK libel laws to suppress criticism. Major media organisations like the BBC and The Guardian crumbled and apologised. But then they sued gardener Helen Steel and postman Dave Morris.In the longest trial in English legal history, the "McLibel Two" represented themselves against McDonald's ?10 million legal team. Every aspect of the corporation's business was cross-examined: from junk food and McJobs, to animal cruelty, environmental damage and advertising to children.Outside the courtroom, Dave brought up his young son alone and Helen supported herself working nights in a bar. McDonald's tried every trick in the book against them. Legal manoeuvres. A visit from Ronald McDonald. Top executives flying to London for secret settlement negotiations. Even spies.Seven years later, in February 2005, the marathon legal battle finally concluded at the European Court of Human Rights. And the result took everyone by surprise - especially the British Government.'McLibel' is not just about hamburgers. It is about the importance of freedom of speech now that multinational corporations are more powerful than countries.Filmed over ten years by no-budget Director Franny Armstrong, 'McLibel' is the David and Goliath story of two people who refused to say sorry. And in doing so, changed the world.An earlier version of the film, 'McLibel: Two Worlds Collide' was released in 1997 and was seen by more than 22 million people worldwide.
"Absolutely unmissable" - The Guardian
"More twists than a John Le Carre novel" - Bermuda Sun
"A landmark documentary" - oneworld.net
"Will satisfy both head and heart" - Time Out
"Intriguing and at times hilarious" - The Scotsman
"The sort of film Michael Moore probably thinks he makes" - The Sunday Times
"Freedom of speech rarely tasted so satisfying. " - The Times Online
"Dynamite. " - Yahoo Movies
"Charming and inspiring" - Radio Times
"Hilarious and engrossing" - BBC website